Jose Isais Garcia Vasquez v. Dotson and Darden

  • Filed: September 25, 2023
  • Status: Victory!
  • Court: Supreme Court of Virginia
  • Latest Update: Sep 25, 2023
Over a light green background is a white circle with a green gavel in the middle.

The ACLU of Virginia filed a case challenging Virginia Department of Correction's (VADOC) refusal to award expanded sentence credits to people with certain convictions, unlawfully extending their incarceration.

VICTORY! On April 18, the Supreme Court of Virginia issued a ruling finding that the Virginia Department of Corrections (VDOC) unlawfully extended the incarceration of Jose Garcia Vasquez by more than eighteen months by withholding sentence credits that he earned while in prison. 

The ACLU of Virginia filed Garcia Vasquez v. Dotson challenging Virginia Department of Correction's (VADOC) refusal to award expanded sentence credits to people with certain convictions, unlawfully extending their incarceration. ACLU of Virginia argued the case in front of the Supreme Court of Virginia on January 10, 2024. You can listen to the arguments here. On April 18, 2024 the Supreme Court of Virginia issued a ruling finding that VADOC unlawfully extended the incarceration of Mr. Garcia Vasquez by more than eighteen months by withholding sentence credits he worked hard to earn and that VADOC must release him.

Since 1995, the earned sentence credit program has made it possible for some people incarcerated in Virginia to earn their release. In 2020, Virginia’s General Assembly passed a law increasing how many credits people can earn. This expansion of the program was expected to impact thousands of people currently incarcerated in VADOC facilities.

Yet for almost two years, VADOC has been improperly withholding earned sentence credits from people who are eligible to earn them. The law clearly states which offenses are not eligible for the additional earned sentence credits, but VADOC extended the law beyond what the General Assembly enacted in order to withhold credits from people who should be eligible because their convictions are not listed among the excluded crimes.

Mr. Jose Garcia Vasquez, 24, has never seen his daughter – now a second grader – outside of prison. In between completing college classes, an electrician course, and working 30 hours every week in a prison job, he squeezes in time to talk to her every single day on the phone.

Mr. Garcia Vasquez is one of hundreds of people who followed the rules of the earned sentence credit program, only to have VADOC’s unlawful interpretation of the law deny them the release they had already worked hard to earn.

Garcia Vasquez v. Dotson is the third case that the ACLU of Virginia has filed on behalf of incarcerated people who were told they would be released, only to be told later they didn’t qualify for the earned sentence credit program. The Supreme Court of Virginia already ruled in Prease v. Clarke, agreeing that VADOC’s interpretation of the law is incorrect and ordering Mr. Steven Prease’s immediate release to his family in southwest Virginia. After the Prease decision, the VADOC reversed course in another ACLU of VA case, Puryear v. Dotson, and agreed that Mr. Puryear's convictions were eligible for enhanced sentence credits, resulting in his release.

The ACLU of Virginia expects VADOC to apply this ruling to everyone in its custody with convictions for attempts, conspiracies, or solicitations that should be eligible for enhanced credits.

Attorney(s):
Geri Greenspan, Vishal Agraharkar

Related Content

Court Case
Oct 17, 2022
Over a light green background is a white circle with a green gavel in the middle.
  • Criminal Legal Reform

Steven Prease v. Clarke and White

The ACLU of Virginia filed Prease v. Clarke in the Virginia Supreme Court, challenging the continued incarceration of Steven Prease and demanding his immediate release from Virginia Department of Corrections (VDOC) custody.
Court Case
Aug 15, 2022
Over a light green background is a white circle with a green gavel in the middle.
  • Criminal Legal Reform

Antoine Anderson v. Clarke and Bowles

The ACLU of Virginia filed Anderson v. Clarke in the Albemarle County Circuit Court, challenging the continued incarceration of Antoine Anderson and demanding his immediate release from Virginia Department of Corrections (VDOC) custody. The petition for a writ of habeas corpus asserts that VDOC officials wrongly interpreted the Governor’s Amendment 19 to the 2022 Budget Bill to apply retroactively, negating the sentence credits earned by Mr. Anderson prior to the budget going into effect.
Court Case
Sep 26, 2023
Over a light green background is a white circle with a green gavel in the middle.
  • Criminal Legal Reform

Leslie L. Puryear v. Dotson and Bailey

The ACLU of Virginia and Relman Colfax PLLC filed a new case challenging Virginia Department of Correction's (VADOC) refusal to award expanded sentence credits to people with certain convictions, unlawfully extending their incarceration. This is one of several cases that the ACLU of Virginia is filing to ensure the earned sentence credit program is properly applied to those who are eligible.